Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
The focus is the foul on the attacker and the referee's viewing angle. The footage shows the United player's foot making contact with the attacker from behind and bringing them down. The defender was not able to challenge for the ball, and without the offence the attacker had an obvious goal-scoring opportunity. The sending-off for DOGSO therefore appears justified. The referee, defender and attacker were nearly in a straight line. From that angle, the foot contact may have been hidden. The defender also put a hand on the attacker, which may have drawn the referee's attention; the referee may have judged that the hand contact alone was insufficient to bring the player down. The incident shows how difficult it is to keep an unobstructed angle when a single pass changes play at speed.
Relevant Laws
Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct (Denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity) / Law 5 – The Referee / Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[DOGSO] A red card for stopping a counter-attack, with the referee judging whether the offence was inside or outside the penalty area | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 4 Gamba Osaka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima
[Handball] A goal disallowed after an on-field review of arm contact in the attacking phase | 2026/27 UEFA Champions League League Phase Matchday 2 Atlético de Madrid vs Manchester United