日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 UEFA Europa League League Phase Matchday 3 Juventus vs Rennes

[Offside / VAR Intervention] Was the defending player's touch deliberate play?

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

VAR / OFR

Offside

VAR Intervention Close call

In the 88th minute, a Juventus free kick on the left was crossed into the centre and touched by a Juventus player. The ball then struck a defending player, and a Juventus player turned in the loose ball for what appeared to be the goal that put Juventus ahead. However, following VAR intervention and an on-field review (OFR), the referee gave an offside offence and the goal was not allowed.

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

The question is whether the defending player's touch, just before the player in an offside position scored, was "deliberate play". There are two points to note. ① At what moment is offside judged? After the cross from the left, a Juventus player touched the ball in the centre. Whether a player is in an offside position is judged at the moment this team-mate touches the ball. The player who was in an offside position at that moment went on to score, so this could be an offside offence. For the assistant referee, the ball was touched after the cross, which made the offside extremely difficult to judge. ② Was the defending player's touch "deliberate play"? After the Juventus player's touch, the ball struck a defending player. If this defending player is judged to have deliberately played the ball, there is no offside offence and the goal stands. If instead the ball is judged to have simply struck the player, or the touch is judged to be a save, it is an offside offence. This judgement depends largely on the referee's own assessment, and the OFR was carried out to check it. The referee judged that the defending player's touch was not deliberate play and gave offside. The Laws of the Game set out the indicators for "deliberately played" as follows. ====== The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player was in control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have ‘deliberately played’ the ball: ◦ The ball travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it ◦ The ball was not moving quickly ◦ The direction of the ball was not unexpected ◦ The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control ◦ A ball moving on the ground is easier to play than a ball in the air A ‘save’ is when a player stops, or attempts to stop, a ball which is going into or very close to the goal with any part of the body except the hands/arms (unless the goalkeeper within the penalty area). ====== The replay shows that the defending player reacted to the ball. However, the ball came from close range, and the movement is hard to describe as an attempt to do something with the ball. The referee's decision after the OFR, that this was not deliberate play and therefore offside, can be considered reasonable. That said, this was an extremely difficult incident for the human eye to judge in an instant.

Relevant Laws

Law 11 – Offside

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Not sure about an offside call? Watch the clip and check it in the app.

The app has video explanations like this one, followed by related Laws quizzes. Judge DB is free, with no ads.

Watch offside clips in the app

Related Scenes