日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 J2 League Matchweek 6 Tegevajaro Miyazaki vs Fujieda MYFC

[Offside / Advantage] An accurate advantage and the process of disallowing a goal after consultation with the assistant referee

Written by Karakasa, Class 2 Football Referee Published

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

Offside / Advantage

Excellent decision

Fujieda MYFC's No. 19 was brought down on the left, but the referee played the advantage and allowed play to continue. Fujieda's No. 10 then received a pass in the centre and scored, but after the referee consulted the assistant referee, an offside offence by a team-mate who had been in front of the goalkeeper was given and the goal was disallowed. Play restarted with an indirect free kick to Tegevajaro Miyazaki.

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

This scene shows an accurate application of advantage and an excellent process by the match officials leading to the goal being disallowed for offside. There are two main points to look at. The first is the timing and judgement of the referee's advantage. Immediately after Fujieda's No. 19 was brought down, as the ball was played in behind, it can be seen that the referee quickly glanced at the assistant referee. If the player running through had been offside, the referee would have needed to stop play and penalise the earlier foul on No. 19. The referee appears to have checked the assistant referee in an instant, established that there was no offside, and then judged that the attacking team still had an advantage before playing it. Even in a fast attack, the referee turned their head, checked the assistant referee and only then chose to play the advantage, which was high-quality refereeing. The second is the process leading to the goal being disallowed, and the referee's positioning. When Fujieda's No. 10 shot, a team-mate in front of the goalkeeper was in an offside position. The assistant referee knew that this player was in an offside position, but how much that player had affected the goalkeeper was a matter for the referee's judgement. The assistant referee therefore did not run towards the halfway line, which is the signal that a goal is allowed, and instead stayed near the corner flag and waited for the referee. The referee, for their part, had taken up a good position in line with the path of the shot. From that position, it is likely that the referee had the information needed to judge whether the player in an offside position was in the path of the shot and how much they had affected the opponent. The referee and the assistant referee, who had stayed near the corner flag, then consulted and correctly reached the conclusion that the goal should be disallowed for offside. This process was an excellent piece of refereeing and a valuable example for match officials.

Relevant Laws

Law 5 - The Referee (Advantage, Positioning) / Law 6 - The Other Match Officials (Assistant referees) / Law 11 - Offside

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Want to test your understanding of this decision?

Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.

Try more questions in the app

Related Scenes