日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 10 Cerezo Osaka vs Kawasaki Frontale

[DOGSO] Was a covering defender able to reach the attacker?

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

DOGSO

Close call

Kawasaki Frontale's No. 17 ran onto a through ball on the right and moved in front of Cerezo Osaka's No. 66, who was chasing from behind. The players made contact and the attacker fell. The referee gave a foul and sent off Cerezo's No. 66 for denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO).

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

The question is whether the four factors for DOGSO were met. These are the distance between the offence and the goal, the general direction of play, the likelihood of keeping or gaining control of the ball, and the location and number of defenders and attackers. The most debatable factor here is whether another Cerezo player could have covered. The footage shows Cerezo's No. 97 closest to the incident, but at the moment of the foul the player was diagonally behind and to the left of the challenge. The referee appears to have judged that the cover could not arrive in time and that the four factors supported a sending-off. Small differences in distance and running lines make this a very close decision. Watch the moment of contact and consider how you would judge it.

Relevant Laws

Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct (Sending-off offences – denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity)

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Want to test your understanding of this decision?

Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.

Try more questions in the app

Related Scenes