Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
This scene is a good opportunity to review whether the ball striking the right arm of Gamba Osaka's No. 2 was a handball offence. In short, the no-handball decision was reasonable. When the ball strikes a player's arm directly after the player's own kick or clearance, it is treated as a "deflection" and, as a rule, is not a handball offence. The referee was probably aware that the ball had struck the arm, but rather than applying advantage, judged it to be "no handball" because of the deflection and allowed play to continue. Even when the footage clearly shows the ball striking an arm, a deflection can mean there is no handball offence. This is worth remembering when learning the Laws of the Game.
Relevant Laws
Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct (Handling the ball)
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Was it handball? Watch the clip and check the reasoning in the app.
See how the Laws separate an unnatural enlargement of the body from accidental contact, then try a related quiz.
Watch handball clips in the appRelated Scenes
[Handball / Penalty Kick] VAR intervention leads to a handball offence and a penalty kick when a shot is blocked | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 1 Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kashima Antlers
[Handball / Goal Disallowed] A goal disallowed for handball when controlling the ball, found during an offside check | J1 League Matchweek 7 FC Machida Zelvia vs Yokohama F. Marinos