日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 12 Gamba Osaka vs Kyoto Sanga F.C.

[No Handball] A miscued clearance deflects onto the player's own arm

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

No Handball

Close call

During a Kyoto Sanga F.C. attack, Gamba Osaka's No. 2 tried to clear a cross from the right but miscued it, and the ball struck the player's own right arm. The referee did not give a handball offence and allowed play to continue. Kyoto Sanga F.C.'s No. 23 picked up the loose ball and scored.

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

This scene is a good opportunity to review whether the ball striking the right arm of Gamba Osaka's No. 2 was a handball offence. In short, the no-handball decision was reasonable. When the ball strikes a player's arm directly after the player's own kick or clearance, it is treated as a "deflection" and, as a rule, is not a handball offence. The referee was probably aware that the ball had struck the arm, but rather than applying advantage, judged it to be "no handball" because of the deflection and allowed play to continue. Even when the footage clearly shows the ball striking an arm, a deflection can mean there is no handball offence. This is worth remembering when learning the Laws of the Game.

Relevant Laws

Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct (Handling the ball)

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Was it handball? Watch the clip and check the reasoning in the app.

See how the Laws separate an unnatural enlargement of the body from accidental contact, then try a related quiz.

Watch handball clips in the app

Related Scenes