Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
Watching the scene again, it can be seen that after the Nagoya player's header the ball strikes the right arm of the Okayama defending player. Even where it is certain that the ball has struck the arm, however, that alone does not make it a handball offence. The Laws of the Game state that not every touch of a player's hand/arm with the ball is an offence. What decides the matter is the way the arm is put out. In this scene, the right arm was used like a block, spread in a way that made the body unnaturally bigger. Judging from the way the arm was put out, the conclusion that this was a handball offence can be regarded as a reasonable one.
Relevant Laws
Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct (Handling the ball)
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[Handball / Penalty Kick] VAR intervention leads to a handball offence and a penalty kick when a shot is blocked | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 1 Yokohama F. Marinos vs Kashima Antlers
[Handball] A superb decision spotting an accidental handball in a crowded area | 2021 J1 League Matchweek 1 Shonan Bellmare vs Sagan Tosu