日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 4 Nagoya Grampus vs Fagiano Okayama

[Handball / Penalty Kick] A corner-kick decision overturned by VAR intervention for a handball against a defending player's arm

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

VAR / OFR

Handball / Penalty Kick

Excellent decision

In a Nagoya Grampus attack, a cross came in from the left and a header was stopped by the goalkeeper; the referee initially awarded a corner kick. The VAR intervened, however, and following an on-field review (OFR) it was accepted that the ball had struck the right arm of a Fagiano Okayama defending player. A handball offence was given and a penalty kick was awarded.

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

Watching the scene again, it can be seen that after the Nagoya player's header the ball strikes the right arm of the Okayama defending player. Even where it is certain that the ball has struck the arm, however, that alone does not make it a handball offence. The Laws of the Game state that not every touch of a player's hand/arm with the ball is an offence. What decides the matter is the way the arm is put out. In this scene, the right arm was used like a block, spread in a way that made the body unnaturally bigger. Judging from the way the arm was put out, the conclusion that this was a handball offence can be regarded as a reasonable one.

Relevant Laws

Law 12 - Fouls and Misconduct (Handling the ball)

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Want to test your understanding of this decision?

Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.

Try more questions in the app

Related Scenes