Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
The DOGSO decision and the referee's running angle are the two points to watch. First, the footage shows the four factors used to assess DOGSO, and the referee judged that the offence warranted a sending-off. Second, the break followed a Kyoto Sangyo University mistake and was difficult for the referee to anticipate. The referee was initially some distance from the ball. Running straight towards it could have placed the referee directly behind the two players, hiding the contact from behind. Instead, the footage shows the referee running to the left to gain an angle. Prioritising a clear view over the shortest distance helped the referee judge the contact and make the sending-off decision. This is an excellent example for match officials.
Relevant Laws
Law 12 – Fouls and Misconduct (Denying an obvious goal-scoring opportunity) / Law 5 – The Referee (Positioning)
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[DOGSO] A red card for stopping a counter-attack, with the referee judging whether the offence was inside or outside the penalty area | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 4 Gamba Osaka vs Sanfrecce Hiroshima
[DOGSO] Was a covering defender able to reach the attacker? | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 10 Cerezo Osaka vs Kawasaki Frontale