Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
This unusual incident brings together an attacking player's encroachment into the penalty area and a feint during the taker's run-up. There are two points to consider. First, the footage shows FC Tokyo's No. 7 entering the penalty area before the kick. Entering early does not automatically mean the player is penalised. What matters is whether the player clearly affected the goalkeeper or played or challenged for the ball. Here the player did neither, and the goal stood. Second, the kicker briefly moved backwards in a feint during the run-up. The opponents protested, but feinting during the run-up is permitted. Feinting to kick once the run-up is complete is an offence, for which the kicker is cautioned and the opponents receive an indirect free kick. Here the movement occurred before the kicker planted the non-kicking foot beside the ball, while still running up, so the feint was permitted. Together, these two details explain why the goal was allowed.
Relevant Laws
Law 14 – The Penalty Kick
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[Caution Rescinded] A possible sending-off is reviewed, the foul is overturned and play restarts with a dropped ball | J1 League Cerezo Osaka vs Yokohama F. Marinos
[No Foul / VAR Intervention] An on-field review of contact between a goalkeeper and an attacking player, with no offence given | 2025 J1 League Matchweek 26 Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Gamba Osaka