日本語
Soccer Laws Dojo

Judge DB

2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 10 Tokyo Verdy vs FC Tokyo

[Goal / Unusual Incident] Encroachment and a feint during the penalty taker's run-up

An original analysis of real match footage.

Final Decision

Goal / Unusual Incident

Rare incident

FC Tokyo's penalty taker scored. Despite protests from the opponents, the referee gave no offence and allowed the goal.

Referee Review

Why was this decision made?

See the key points from a referee’s perspective

Show explanation

How the footage and Laws apply

This unusual incident brings together an attacking player's encroachment into the penalty area and a feint during the taker's run-up. There are two points to consider. First, the footage shows FC Tokyo's No. 7 entering the penalty area before the kick. Entering early does not automatically mean the player is penalised. What matters is whether the player clearly affected the goalkeeper or played or challenged for the ball. Here the player did neither, and the goal stood. Second, the kicker briefly moved backwards in a feint during the run-up. The opponents protested, but feinting during the run-up is permitted. Feinting to kick once the run-up is complete is an offence, for which the kicker is cautioned and the opponents receive an indirect free kick. Here the movement occurred before the kicker planted the non-kicking foot beside the ball, while still running up, so the feint was permitted. Together, these two details explain why the goal was allowed.

Relevant Laws

Law 14 – The Penalty Kick

Official references

Check the wording of the Laws

The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.

Want to test your understanding of this decision?

Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.

Try more questions in the app

Related Scenes