Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanation
Referee Review
Why was this decision made?
See the key points from a referee’s perspective
Show explanationHow the footage and Laws apply
It was an excellent counter-attack by Okayama, but look also at how the referee and the assistant referee divided their responsibilities. First, when the shot was finally taken, the referee was near the penalty area and able to watch it while standing still. Having run all the way on a counter-attack and still being able to stop and watch was, in my view, excellent running. Next, the handling of No. 99, who had drifted out to the right. It is of course important for the referee and assistant referee to watch a player from both sides, but in this situation I personally think it was acceptable to leave much of it to the assistant referee. There are two reasons. The first is that there was no offside concern. With No. 99 the only player out ahead, no offside offence could arise from a subsequent pass. The assistant referee could therefore focus on whether the ball went out of play and on fouls. The second is the referee's priorities. The referee does, to some degree, need to watch for fouls in No. 99's challenges, but even more important is to see where the Okayama player coming from the centre is running and whether a defending player in the centre commits a foul during the counter-attack. Moving towards the right is also a valid option, but ultimately a pass from the right into the centre was the most likely outcome. Rather than going to the right, the referee left that to the assistant referee and watched the centre closely. As the ball did eventually come into the centre, the referee was able to watch it. This was a scene in which the referee and assistant referee divided their responsibilities very well.
Relevant Laws
Law 5 - The Referee (Positioning) / Law 6 - The Other Match Officials (Assistant referees)
Official references
Check the wording of the Laws
The links above lead to official IFAB and JFA resources. The application of the Laws to this incident is the author’s analysis and is not an official view of IFAB, JFA or the competition organiser.
Want to test your understanding of this decision?
Build confidence with more Laws of the Game questions in the app.
Try more questions in the appRelated Scenes
[Positioning] The referee's running on a counter-attack, and the assistant referee keeping the line with side-steps | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 4 Kawasaki Frontale vs JEF United Chiba
[Refereeing] The referee's running on a counter-attack, avoiding blind spots to keep a clear view | 2026/27 J1 League Matchweek 7 Sanfrecce Hiroshima vs Cerezo Osaka